Industry Wisdom

What’s frustrating is the messed up work, not too-much work!

Software Testing StudioComment(0)

Me: Good Morning! How is work?

She: Bad ?

How is the Work Going?

Me: Why? Too much work or Too messed work?

She: ? You got it ?

Most of the times people are not afraid of too much work or learning something new or stretched working hours. What’s frustrating is the messed up work, not too-much work. And why is it messed up?

  • Honest Mis-management ?
  • Unnecessary Overhead ?
  • Natural Politics ?
  • Never-ending Discussions/Meetings ?
  • Obvious Time-management ?

360 Degree review might help. Or measuring your team’s pulse. Or ‘acted-upon’ retrospectives.

Inviting your valuable comments/insights on the managed work & messed-up solutions ?

Looking for a Job Change in QA/Testing technology? Get Regular Job notifications @ WhatsApp!

Related Articles
Industry Wisdom

Notice period is the only time you are noticed the most!

Software Testing Studio

Some say serving notice is just like your ‘honeymoon period’. Is it because you are leaving the firm and no more accountable? Or why put efforts for something you know is soon going to end? Coming late – Going early becomes normal? Why?
Industry Wisdom Test Planning & Management

Manual vs Automation Testing | Which is the best among equals?

Software Testing Studio

Software testing, though complex, is an integral part of any successful software project. On a high level there are basically two methods to complete the software verification & validation – Manual and Automated testing. While both types of testing are beneficial to web application development, there has been a plethora of speculation on whether software testing should be done manually or be automated. Creation of excellent software demands effective and timely quality testing; and in these times of production on the go, the debate continues on the purpose and efficiency of manual vs. automation testing. Each testing method has its pros and cons but the truth is that regardless of which side of the fence you sit on (manual vs. automated), the argument is largely irrelevant; to achieve high quality software and reduced time to market both methodologies are essential. Let’s explore the 19 key consideration…
Functional Testing Industry Wisdom

Do we really need Manual Testing?

Software Testing Studio

Quality – Why is this word so important for your software? Software teams today involve a number of people: developers, testers, support engineers, designers, product managers, and executive stake holders. A low quality software impacts all of these or in other words everyone in the team is responsible for the quality of software delivered. When we look into the overall effectiveness or cost manual testing still have a pivotal role to play. Unfortunately, very little discussion is only happening on how to improve efficiency of manual testing instead most of discussions are happening on how to increase the level of automation. Many of us would advocate the fact that Manual Testing is no longer needed, and I know it well why they think so. It is mostly because of the drawbacks and challenges associated with Manual Testing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *